Here are some of the issues we have consulted on and their outcomes. See all outcomes
We asked your views on proposed changes for assessing wildfowling consents on protected sites. These included proposals:
A total of 613 responses were received to the consultation; 78 of these were from representatives of organisations and the rest were from individuals. 92% of respondents were wildfowlers.
Respondents strongly supported some proposals, such as annual liaison meetings and wildfowling visits. Some proposals, such as the use of site management plans, provoked a mixed response. Other proposals, such as the proposal to link longer term plans to bird abundance figures, had less support. Some concerns were raised around lack of trust between Natural England and wildfowling clubs.
We recognise that a wide range of views have been put forward and we wish to reassure all consultees that no pre-emptive action will be taken until we have fully explored these issues with stakeholders. We have noted the concerns raised and will reflect on which proposals were supported, and which were not. To take this discussion forward, we will invite key representatives to a workshop to better understand the range of views and to build relationships and consensus between representatives. We need to start by building understanding of the opportunities for reform that exist in this area and to progress only on the basis of clear understanding and mutual trust.
For your views on the notification of the Mid Cornwall Moors SSSI.
Whether you objected, supported or were neutral towards the notification; see Annex 1 of Natural England Board paper under ‘Board meetings’ at: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/natural-england/about/our-governance
Responses through Citizen Space: see "Results Updated 15 November 2017" for a file showing comments from RSPB which expressed support for the Mid Cornwall Moors SSSI notification.
Consider all objections and representations. Officers discussed and clarified points with individuals to ensure the notification documents and evidence were understood, and discussed the meaning of the SSSI in relation to farming and land management. Officers made recommendations to the Board of Natural England who approved confirmation of the notification with modifications to the boundary map (removing land not considered to be of special scientific interest) along with changes to the citation (description of the special interest). The final legal documents are available on this page.
Details of the Board’s decision will be available in due course at: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/natural-england/about/our-governance.
The Mid Cornwall Moors SSSI is now protected in perpetuity.
For your views on the notification of the West Pennine Moors SSSI.
Whether you objected, supported or were neutral towards the notification, see Annex 1 of Natural England Board paper under ‘Board meetings’ at: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/natural-england/about/our-governance
See "Results Updated 10 Aug 2017" for a file showing comments from individuals who were either in support of, or neutral towards the West Pennine Moors SSSI notification.
Consider all objections and representations. Officers discussed and clarified points with individuals to ensure the notification documents and evidence were understood, and discussed the meaning of the SSSI in relation to farming and land management. Officers made recommendations to the Board of Natural England who approved confirmation of the notification with modifications to the boundary map (removing land not considered to be of sufficient special scientific interest) along with changes to the citation (description of the special interest) and views about management to improve their clarity. The final legal documents are available on this page.
Details of the Board’s decision will be available in due course at: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/natural-england/about/our-governance.
The West Pennine Moors SSSI is now protected in perpetuity.